Full Text

 

News

What UCB Is Really Up To This Time, No Kidding

Dan Mogulof
Tuesday August 04, 2020 - 04:10:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern,

The following event listing is rife with misleading and/or erroneous information, and we hope it will be corrected as quickly as possible. We also expect any future reporting about 1921 Walnut to be factual and accurate

http://berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2020-08-01/contact

Please allow me to reiterate a few, key facts about 1921 Walnut that we have consistently conveyed to media…to residents of the building…and to the City of Berkeley: 

  • There is no imminent action planned for the property. Residents will be allowed to remain in their units for some time as the University is contemplating the development of the entire block but has not yet decided to demolish the building.
  • While the University is preparing a relocation plan, relocation will not actually commence unless and until the campus moves forward with a plan to demolish the building, which does not exist at present.
  • For eligible residents, relocation offers could include payment for moving expenses and financial assistance for rental or purchase costs of a replacement dwelling. Relocation assistance packages would, among other things, factor in household income, costs of comparable housing, and moving expenses. The amount of assistance would take into account the circumstances of each household.
IN addition the ridiculous claims about secrecy and the identify of the donating foundation are demonstrably false. Here’s is a copy of what we have sent to inquiring reporters since last May: 

"UC Berkeley is pleased to confirm that the Helen Diller Foundation is the heretofore anonymous donor working with the campus on a new student housing project. The campus has no additional information to share about the project beyond that which is included in this publicly available memo that was provided to the UC Regents’ Finance and Capital Strategies Committee in January 2020. 

The foundation has asked that we share the following statement with interested journalists and members of the public who inquire about the project: 

The Helen Diller Foundation is pleased to be working with UC Berkeley to address the student housing crisis. This collaborative effort represents the continuation of a long-standing relationship between the Diller family and the campus, dating back to when Sanford and Helen Diller were undergraduates at the university. The foundation sees this planned investment as an embodiment of its deep belief in, and support for, public higher education in general, and UC Berkeley in particular. The foundation will be pleased to share additional information and answer questions about the project when plans are finalized, prior to the start of construction.” 

Sincerely, 

 

Dan Mogulof 

Asst. Vice Chancellor 

Office of Communications and Public Affairs 

UC Berkeley 

 

(m) 510-919-6954 


Open Letter to the Berkeley City Council

Carol Denney
Tuesday August 04, 2020 - 02:09:00 PM

Anyone in a leadership position in the City of Berkeley should recognize that the burning of a Black church, The Way on University Avenue, is more than simple arson. Our Chief of Police apparently suggested that "no one was hurt." This comment speaks volumes. 

Please join your voices in a united effort to make sure the Berkeley Police Department has better leadership for the sake of the future we hope to have, where all communities are respected and racist acts of terror are recognized for what they are - efforts to frighten, silence, and intimidate which have serious effects on our whole community, but especially on vulnerable, targeted communities of color.


UPDATE: Berkeley Police Officer Fires Weapon After Interrupting Robbery Thursday Night

Kathleen Kirkwood (BCN)
Saturday August 01, 2020 - 03:23:00 PM

An officer fired her gun Thursday night after coming upon three suspects robbing a Berkeley drug store but police aren't sure if anyone was hit by gunfire. 

The officer was in the area of the CVS Pharmacy at 1451 Shattuck Ave. about 9:15 p.m. when she spotted a robbery taking place. 

The officer tried to detain the suspects and fired her weapon. It was not known if gunfire hit any of the suspects, who fled the scene in a dark-colored sedan. Police have checked at local hospitals and said no related injuries have been reported, Berkeley police spokesman Byron White said Friday. 

The Berkeley officer's foot was injured in the incident and she was treated and released at a hospital, White said. Neighbors who were present told the Planet the car ran over her foot. 

Police did not release any information about whether the suspects were armed. 

The shooting is being investigated by police and the officer will be placed on administrative leave, according to police. 

Anyone with information about the incident is asked to call Berkeley police at (510) 981-5741.


Press Release: Person Struck by Gunfire in North Berkeley

Ofc. Byron White, Berkeley Police
Saturday August 01, 2020 - 03:01:00 PM

On August 1st at 3:53 am, officers responded to the area of Solano Avenue and Fresno Avenue on a report of gunfire in the area. When officers arrived, they discovered a man in his 20’s on the ground with a single gunshot wound on the 900 block of Fresno Avenue. The Berkeley Fire Department transported the man to a local hospital with serious injuries. 

Officers will remain in the area while we continue the investigation. If anyone has information about this incident, please contact BPD’s Homicide Unit at (510) 981-5741. 

Case 2020-00035962


Diana E. H. Russell
1939-2020

Tuesday August 04, 2020 - 02:05:00 PM

Diana E. H. Russell, world-renowned feminist activist, scholar, and author died July 28th in Oakland, California. She was 81 years old. The cause of her death was cardiac arrest. 

Diana Russell devoted her life to the remediation of crimes against women. She authored numerous books and articles on marital rape, femicide, incest, misogynist murders of women, and pornography. In addition to her scholarship, Diana was a grass roots organizer. In the mid-1970s, she started lobbying feminists around the world. Her organizing efforts resulted in the first International Tribunal on Crimes against Women in Brussels, Belgium. Two thousand women from 40 countries heard first-hand accounts of the gender-related violence and oppression tribunal speakers had experienced. Simone de Beauvoir in her introductory speech to the Tribunal said: "I salute the International Tribunal as the beginning of the radical decolonization of women." Later, Belgian feminist Nicole Van de Ven documented the event in a book, Crimes Against Women: The Proceedings of the International Tribunal

Diana Russell was born and raised in Cape Town, South Africa, the fourth of the six children of a South African father and a British mother. After completing her Bachelor's degree from the University of Cape Town, at the age of 19, Russell left for the United Kingdom. 

In Britain, she enrolled in the London School of Economics in Political Science. In 1961, she completed a Master’s degree and received the prize for the best student in the program. In 1963 she was accepted into an interdisciplinary PhD program at Harvard University and she moved to Boston. Her research focused on sociology and the study of revolution. 

Diana’s research focus stemmed from her own involvement in the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. In 1963, Russell had joined the Liberal Party of South Africa that had been founded by Alan Paton, the author of Cry the Beloved Country. While participating in a peaceful protest in Cape Town, Russell was arrested with other party members. She came to the conclusion that non-violent strategies were futile against the brutal violence and repression of the white Afrikaner police state. Thereafter, she joined the African Resistance Movement (ARM), an underground revolutionary movement fighting apartheid in South Africa. The principal strategy of the ARM was to bomb and sabotage government property, and though Russell was only a peripheral member of the ARM, she still risked a 10-year incarceration if caught. During this period, Diana’s father was a member of the emphatically apartheid parliament of South Africa. 

After completing her doctorate, Diana was hired as a sociology professor at Mills College in Oakland, California. During her first year, she co-taught the first course on women ever offered at Mills. Eventually this course led to the development of the Women’s Studies curriculum at Mills –one of the first in the U.S. 

In 1977, Diana conducted an extensive series of in-depth interviews with women. Data she gathered from these nine hundred interviews appeared in a series of books: Rape in Marriage (1982), Sexual Exploitation: Rape, Child Sexual Abuse, Workplace Harassment (1984), and The Secret Trauma: Incest in the Lives of Girls and Women (1986). The Secret Trauma, the first scientific study of incestuous abuse ever conducted, was the co-recipient of the prestigious C. Wright Mills Award in 1986. 

In 1987, Diana traveled to South Africa to conduct interviews with revolutionary women activists in the anti-apartheid liberation struggle. Upon her return, she published Lives of Courage: Women for a New South Africa (1989). In 1993, Diana edited an anthology on pornography, Making Violence Sexy: Feminist Views on Pornography. Her 1994 book, Against Pornography: The Evidence of Harm, which included 100 pornographic photos, made the connection between pornography and increased incidents of rape. 

Perhaps Diana’s most significant theoretical contribution to the field of women’s studies was a single word. In 1976 Russell redefined ‘femicide’ as "the killing of females by males because they are female." Russell's intention was to politicize the term. She wanted to bring attention to the misogyny driving lethal crimes against women, which she said gender-neutral terms like murder failed to do. In order to deal with these extreme crimes against women, Diana insisted, it was necessary to recognize that, like race-based hate crimes, "Femicides are [also] lethal hate crimes." 

Feminist movements in many countries in Latin America, as in Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Chile, and El Salvador among others, have adopted the use of Russell's politicized 'femicide' and have successfully used it socially, politically and legally to address lethal violence against women in their respective countries. In 1992, she co-edited an anthology, Femicide: The Politics of Woman Killing. 

In addition to her publications, Diana always found time for boots-on-the ground activism. She was often on the front lines of feminist protests in the USA, South Africa, Europe, and the U.K. In concert with other feminists, she demonstrated outside courthouses and theaters; she staged sit-ins in various government offices; she spray-painted feminist slogans on misogynist businesses; and destroyed magazines in porn stores. For many months, she was the solo picketer outside a Berkeley restaurant owned by a trafficker in underage girls. Her acts of civil disobedience often satirized her targets. In 1991, for example, a waitress refused to serve a male customer because he was reading Playboy. She was fired for her act of rebellion. Hefner responded by flying in a large quantity of issues of his magazine that were distributed free to all the diner customers to read. Diana and six friends dressed as waitresses and served ketchup-covered penises and testicles (adroitly sculpted hotdogs) on plates to the crowd that had gathered outside. 

For her various acts of civil disobedience, Diana paid a price. She was sued, arrested a half dozen times, and, on occasion, physically attacked. She remained undaunted. 

She continued to start feminist organizations. In 1977, Diana co-founded Women Against Violence in Pornography and Media (WAVPM), the first feminist anti-pornography organization in the United States and internationally. She also founded FANG (Feminists’ Anti-Nuclear Group) in response to the failure of the peace movement to recognize the role of patriarchy in the development of nuclear arms. This culminated in the publication of Exposing Nuclear Phallacies (1989), designated an Outstanding Book on human rights in the United States by the Gustavus Myers Center in 1990. In 1993, Russell initiated an organization called Women United Against Incest, which supports incest survivors with legal assistance against their perpetrators. Similarly, she created the first TV program in South Africa where incest survivors talk in person about their experiences. 

After spending a half century conducting research, writing and publishing books and articles, public speaking, and political activism to combat male sexual violence against females, Diana shifted her attention to her memoirs. She died before she could complete them. For a more complete summary of Diana’s life and accomplishments, please visit her website: dianarussell.com. 

Consonant with her egalitarian values, Diana lived in a collective household with several other women and a succession of cherished rescue dogs. On the occasions when she allowed herself time-outs from her work, she shared a meal with one of her friends. Those of us fortunate enough to be included in her circle were awed by her single-minded dedication and her remarkable achievements. In addition to our reverence for her, we loved her. 

She is survived by her sister Jill Russell, scores of friends and co-activists, and the thousands of women who owe their survival to her work. 

In her honor, donations can be made to any feminist organization or to 

Diana E. H. Russell, world-renowned feminist activist, scholar, and author died July 28th in Oakland, California. She was 81 years old. The cause of her death was cardiac arrest. 

Diana Russell devoted her life to the remediation of crimes against women. She authored numerous books and articles on marital rape, femicide, incest, misogynist murders of women, and pornography. In addition to her scholarship, Diana was a grass roots organizer. In the mid-1970s, she started lobbying feminists around the world. Her organizing efforts resulted in the first International Tribunal on Crimes against Women in Brussels, Belgium. Two thousand women from 40 countries heard first-hand accounts of the gender-related violence and oppression tribunal speakers had experienced. Simone de Beauvoir in her introductory speech to the Tribunal said: "I salute the International Tribunal as the beginning of the radical decolonization of women." Later, Belgian feminist Nicole Van de Ven documented the event in a book, Crimes Against Women: The Proceedings of the International Tribunal

Diana Russell was born and raised in Cape Town, South Africa, the fourth of the six children of a South African father and a British mother. After completing her Bachelor's degree from the University of Cape Town, at the age of 19, Russell left for the United Kingdom. 

In Britain, she enrolled in the London School of Economics in Political Science. In 1961, she completed a Master’s degree and received the prize for the best student in the program. In 1963 she was accepted into an interdisciplinary PhD program at Harvard University and she moved to Boston. Her research focused on sociology and the study of revolution. 

Diana’s research focus stemmed from her own involvement in the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. In 1963, Russell had joined the Liberal Party of South Africa that had been founded by Alan Paton, the author of Cry the Beloved Country. While participating in a peaceful protest in Cape Town, Russell was arrested with other party members. She came to the conclusion that non-violent strategies were futile against the brutal violence and repression of the white Afrikaner police state. Thereafter, she joined the African Resistance Movement (ARM), an underground revolutionary movement fighting apartheid in South Africa. The principal strategy of the ARM was to bomb and sabotage government property, and though Russell was only a peripheral member of the ARM, she still risked a 10-year incarceration if caught. During this period, Diana’s father was a member of the emphatically apartheid parliament of South Africa. 

After completing her doctorate, Diana was hired as a sociology professor at Mills College in Oakland, California. During her first year, she co-taught the first course on women ever offered at Mills. Eventually this course led to the development of the Women’s Studies curriculum at Mills –one of the first in the U.S. 

In 1977, Diana conducted an extensive series of in-depth interviews with women. Data she gathered from these nine hundred interviews appeared in a series of books: Rape in Marriage (1982), Sexual Exploitation: Rape, Child Sexual Abuse, Workplace Harassment (1984), and The Secret Trauma: Incest in the Lives of Girls and Women (1986). The Secret Trauma, the first scientific study of incestuous abuse ever conducted, was the co-recipient of the prestigious C. Wright Mills Award in 1986. 

In 1987, Diana traveled to South Africa to conduct interviews with revolutionary women activists in the anti-apartheid liberation struggle. Upon her return, she published Lives of Courage: Women for a New South Africa (1989). In 1993, Diana edited an anthology on pornography, Making Violence Sexy: Feminist Views on Pornography. Her 1994 book, Against Pornography: The Evidence of Harm, which included 100 pornographic photos, made the connection between pornography and increased incidents of rape. 

Perhaps Diana’s most significant theoretical contribution to the field of women’s studies was a single word. In 1976 Russell redefined ‘femicide’ as "the killing of females by males because they are female." Russell's intention was to politicize the term. She wanted to bring attention to the misogyny driving lethal crimes against women, which she said gender-neutral terms like murder failed to do. In order to deal with these extreme crimes against women, Diana insisted, it was necessary to recognize that, like race-based hate crimes, "Femicides are [also] lethal hate crimes." 

Feminist movements in many countries in Latin America, as in Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Chile, and El Salvador among others, have adopted the use of Russell's politicized 'femicide' and have successfully used it socially, politically and legally to address lethal violence against women in their respective countries. In 1992, she co-edited an anthology, Femicide: The Politics of Woman Killing. 

In addition to her publications, Diana always found time for boots-on-the ground activism. She was often on the front lines of feminist protests in the USA, South Africa, Europe, and the U.K. In concert with other feminists, she demonstrated outside courthouses and theaters; she staged sit-ins in various government offices; she spray-painted feminist slogans on misogynist businesses; and destroyed magazines in porn stores. For many months, she was the solo picketer outside a Berkeley restaurant owned by a trafficker in underage girls. Her acts of civil disobedience often satirized her targets. In 1991, for example, a waitress refused to serve a male customer because he was reading Playboy. She was fired for her act of rebellion. Hefner responded by flying in a large quantity of issues of his magazine that were distributed free to all the diner customers to read. Diana and six friends dressed as waitresses and served ketchup-covered penises and testicles (adroitly sculpted hotdogs) on plates to the crowd that had gathered outside. 

For her various acts of civil disobedience, Diana paid a price. She was sued, arrested a half dozen times, and, on occasion, physically attacked. She remained undaunted. 

She continued to start feminist organizations. In 1977, Diana co-founded Women Against Violence in Pornography and Media (WAVPM), the first feminist anti-pornography organization in the United States and internationally. She also founded FANG (Feminists’ Anti-Nuclear Group) in response to the failure of the peace movement to recognize the role of patriarchy in the development of nuclear arms. This culminated in the publication of Exposing Nuclear Phallacies (1989), designated an Outstanding Book on human rights in the United States by the Gustavus Myers Center in 1990. In 1993, Russell initiated an organization called Women United Against Incest, which supports incest survivors with legal assistance against their perpetrators. Similarly, she created the first TV program in South Africa where incest survivors talk in person about their experiences. 

After spending a half century conducting research, writing and publishing books and articles, public speaking, and political activism to combat male sexual violence against females, Diana shifted her attention to her memoirs. She died before she could complete them. For a more complete summary of Diana’s life and accomplishments, please visit her website: dianarussell.com. 

Consonant with her egalitarian values, Diana lived in a collective household with several other women and a succession of cherished rescue dogs. On the occasions when she allowed herself time-outs from her work, she shared a meal with one of her friends. Those of us fortunate enough to be included in her circle were awed by her single-minded dedication and her remarkable achievements. In addition to our reverence for her, we loved her. 

She is survived by her sister Jill Russell, scores of friends and co-activists, and the thousands of women who owe their survival to her work. 

In her honor, donations can be made to any feminist organization or to 

Diana E. H. Russell, world-renowned feminist activist, scholar, and author died July 28th in Oakland, California. She was 81 years old. The cause of her death was cardiac arrest. 

Diana Russell devoted her life to the remediation of crimes against women. She authored numerous books and articles on marital rape, femicide, incest, misogynist murders of women, and pornography. In addition to her scholarship, Diana was a grass roots organizer. In the mid-1970s, she started lobbying feminists around the world. Her organizing efforts resulted in the first International Tribunal on Crimes against Women in Brussels, Belgium. Two thousand women from 40 countries heard first-hand accounts of the gender-related violence and oppression tribunal speakers had experienced. Simone de Beauvoir in her introductory speech to the Tribunal said: "I salute the International Tribunal as the beginning of the radical decolonization of women." Later, Belgian feminist Nicole Van de Ven documented the event in a book, Crimes Against Women: The Proceedings of the International Tribunal

Diana Russell was born and raised in Cape Town, South Africa, the fourth of the six children of a South African father and a British mother. After completing her Bachelor's degree from the University of Cape Town, at the age of 19, Russell left for the United Kingdom. 

In Britain, she enrolled in the London School of Economics in Political Science. In 1961, she completed a Master’s degree and received the prize for the best student in the program. In 1963 she was accepted into an interdisciplinary PhD program at Harvard University and she moved to Boston. Her research focused on sociology and the study of revolution. 

Diana’s research focus stemmed from her own involvement in the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. In 1963, Russell had joined the Liberal Party of South Africa that had been founded by Alan Paton, the author of Cry the Beloved Country. While participating in a peaceful protest in Cape Town, Russell was arrested with other party members. She came to the conclusion that non-violent strategies were futile against the brutal violence and repression of the white Afrikaner police state. Thereafter, she joined the African Resistance Movement (ARM), an underground revolutionary movement fighting apartheid in South Africa. The principal strategy of the ARM was to bomb and sabotage government property, and though Russell was only a peripheral member of the ARM, she still risked a 10-year incarceration if caught. During this period, Diana’s father was a member of the emphatically apartheid parliament of South Africa. 

After completing her doctorate, Diana was hired as a sociology professor at Mills College in Oakland, California. During her first year, she co-taught the first course on women ever offered at Mills. Eventually this course led to the development of the Women’s Studies curriculum at Mills –one of the first in the U.S. 

In 1977, Diana conducted an extensive series of in-depth interviews with women. Data she gathered from these nine hundred interviews appeared in a series of books: Rape in Marriage (1982), Sexual Exploitation: Rape, Child Sexual Abuse, Workplace Harassment (1984), and The Secret Trauma: Incest in the Lives of Girls and Women (1986). The Secret Trauma, the first scientific study of incestuous abuse ever conducted, was the co-recipient of the prestigious C. Wright Mills Award in 1986. 

In 1987, Diana traveled to South Africa to conduct interviews with revolutionary women activists in the anti-apartheid liberation struggle. Upon her return, she published Lives of Courage: Women for a New South Africa (1989). In 1993, Diana edited an anthology on pornography, Making Violence Sexy: Feminist Views on Pornography. Her 1994 book, Against Pornography: The Evidence of Harm, which included 100 pornographic photos, made the connection between pornography and increased incidents of rape. 

Perhaps Diana’s most significant theoretical contribution to the field of women’s studies was a single word. In 1976 Russell redefined ‘femicide’ as "the killing of females by males because they are female." Russell's intention was to politicize the term. She wanted to bring attention to the misogyny driving lethal crimes against women, which she said gender-neutral terms like murder failed to do. In order to deal with these extreme crimes against women, Diana insisted, it was necessary to recognize that, like race-based hate crimes, "Femicides are [also] lethal hate crimes." 

Feminist movements in many countries in Latin America, as in Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Chile, and El Salvador among others, have adopted the use of Russell's politicized 'femicide' and have successfully used it socially, politically and legally to address lethal violence against women in their respective countries. In 1992, she co-edited an anthology, Femicide: The Politics of Woman Killing. 

In addition to her publications, Diana always found time for boots-on-the ground activism. She was often on the front lines of feminist protests in the USA, South Africa, Europe, and the U.K. In concert with other feminists, she demonstrated outside courthouses and theaters; she staged sit-ins in various government offices; she spray-painted feminist slogans on misogynist businesses; and destroyed magazines in porn stores. For many months, she was the solo picketer outside a Berkeley restaurant owned by a trafficker in underage girls. Her acts of civil disobedience often satirized her targets. In 1991, for example, a waitress refused to serve a male customer because he was reading Playboy. She was fired for her act of rebellion. Hefner responded by flying in a large quantity of issues of his magazine that were distributed free to all the diner customers to read. Diana and six friends dressed as waitresses and served ketchup-covered penises and testicles (adroitly sculpted hotdogs) on plates to the crowd that had gathered outside. 

For her various acts of civil disobedience, Diana paid a price. She was sued, arrested a half dozen times, and, on occasion, physically attacked. She remained undaunted. 

She continued to start feminist organizations. In 1977, Diana co-founded Women Against Violence in Pornography and Media (WAVPM), the first feminist anti-pornography organization in the United States and internationally. She also founded FANG (Feminists’ Anti-Nuclear Group) in response to the failure of the peace movement to recognize the role of patriarchy in the development of nuclear arms. This culminated in the publication of Exposing Nuclear Phallacies (1989), designated an Outstanding Book on human rights in the United States by the Gustavus Myers Center in 1990. In 1993, Russell initiated an organization called Women United Against Incest, which supports incest survivors with legal assistance against their perpetrators. Similarly, she created the first TV program in South Africa where incest survivors talk in person about their experiences. 

After spending a half century conducting research, writing and publishing books and articles, public speaking, and political activism to combat male sexual violence against females, Diana shifted her attention to her memoirs. She died before she could complete them. For a more complete summary of Diana’s life and accomplishments, please visit her website: dianarussell.com. 

Consonant with her egalitarian values, Diana lived in a collective household with several other women and a succession of cherished rescue dogs. On the occasions when she allowed herself time-outs from her work, she shared a meal with one of her friends. Those of us fortunate enough to be included in her circle were awed by her single-minded dedication and her remarkable achievements. In addition to our reverence for her, we loved her. 

She is survived by her sister Jill Russell, scores of friends and co-activists, and the thousands of women who owe their survival to her work. 

In her honor, donations can be made to any feminist organization or to your local ASPCA. 

Diana E. H. Russell, world-renowned feminist activist, scholar, and author died July 28th in Oakland, California. She was 81 years old. The cause of her death was cardiac arrest. 

Diana Russell devoted her life to the remediation of crimes against women. She authored numerous books and articles on marital rape, femicide, incest, misogynist murders of women, and pornography. In addition to her scholarship, Diana was a grass roots organizer. In the mid-1970s, she started lobbying feminists around the world. Her organizing efforts resulted in the first International Tribunal on Crimes against Women in Brussels, Belgium. Two thousand women from 40 countries heard first-hand accounts of the gender-related violence and oppression tribunal speakers had experienced. Simone de Beauvoir in her introductory speech to the Tribunal said: "I salute the International Tribunal as the beginning of the radical decolonization of women." Later, Belgian feminist Nicole Van de Ven documented the event in a book, Crimes Against Women: The Proceedings of the International Tribunal

Diana Russell was born and raised in Cape Town, South Africa, the fourth of the six children of a South African father and a British mother. After completing her Bachelor's degree from the University of Cape Town, at the age of 19, Russell left for the United Kingdom. 

In Britain, she enrolled in the London School of Economics in Political Science. In 1961, she completed a Master’s degree and received the prize for the best student in the program. In 1963 she was accepted into an interdisciplinary PhD program at Harvard University and she moved to Boston. Her research focused on sociology and the study of revolution. 

Diana’s research focus stemmed from her own involvement in the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. In 1963, Russell had joined the Liberal Party of South Africa that had been founded by Alan Paton, the author of Cry the Beloved Country. While participating in a peaceful protest in Cape Town, Russell was arrested with other party members. She came to the conclusion that non-violent strategies were futile against the brutal violence and repression of the white Afrikaner police state. Thereafter, she joined the African Resistance Movement (ARM), an underground revolutionary movement fighting apartheid in South Africa. The principal strategy of the ARM was to bomb and sabotage government property, and though Russell was only a peripheral member of the ARM, she still risked a 10-year incarceration if caught. During this period, Diana’s father was a member of the emphatically apartheid parliament of South Africa. 

After completing her doctorate, Diana was hired as a sociology professor at Mills College in Oakland, California. During her first year, she co-taught the first course on women ever offered at Mills. Eventually this course led to the development of the Women’s Studies curriculum at Mills –one of the first in the U.S. 

In 1977, Diana conducted an extensive series of in-depth interviews with women. Data she gathered from these nine hundred interviews appeared in a series of books: Rape in Marriage (1982), Sexual Exploitation: Rape, Child Sexual Abuse, Workplace Harassment (1984), and The Secret Trauma: Incest in the Lives of Girls and Women (1986). The Secret Trauma, the first scientific study of incestuous abuse ever conducted, was the co-recipient of the prestigious C. Wright Mills Award in 1986. 

In 1987, Diana traveled to South Africa to conduct interviews with revolutionary women activists in the anti-apartheid liberation struggle. Upon her return, she published Lives of Courage: Women for a New South Africa (1989). In 1993, Diana edited an anthology on pornography, Making Violence Sexy: Feminist Views on Pornography. Her 1994 book, Against Pornography: The Evidence of Harm, which included 100 pornographic photos, made the connection between pornography and increased incidents of rape. 

Perhaps Diana’s most significant theoretical contribution to the field of women’s studies was a single word. In 1976 Russell redefined ‘femicide’ as "the killing of females by males because they are female." Russell's intention was to politicize the term. She wanted to bring attention to the misogyny driving lethal crimes against women, which she said gender-neutral terms like murder failed to do. In order to deal with these extreme crimes against women, Diana insisted, it was necessary to recognize that, like race-based hate crimes, "Femicides are [also] lethal hate crimes." 

Feminist movements in many countries in Latin America, as in Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Chile, and El Salvador among others, have adopted the use of Russell's politicized 'femicide' and have successfully used it socially, politically and legally to address lethal violence against women in their respective countries. In 1992, she co-edited an anthology, Femicide: The Politics of Woman Killing. 

In addition to her publications, Diana always found time for boots-on-the ground activism. She was often on the front lines of feminist protests in the USA, South Africa, Europe, and the U.K. In concert with other feminists, she demonstrated outside courthouses and theaters; she staged sit-ins in various government offices; she spray-painted feminist slogans on misogynist businesses; and destroyed magazines in porn stores. For many months, she was the solo picketer outside a Berkeley restaurant owned by a trafficker in underage girls. Her acts of civil disobedience often satirized her targets. In 1991, for example, a waitress refused to serve a male customer because he was reading Playboy. She was fired for her act of rebellion. Hefner responded by flying in a large quantity of issues of his magazine that were distributed free to all the diner customers to read. Diana and six friends dressed as waitresses and served ketchup-covered penises and testicles (adroitly sculpted hotdogs) on plates to the crowd that had gathered outside. 

For her various acts of civil disobedience, Diana paid a price. She was sued, arrested a half dozen times, and, on occasion, physically attacked. She remained undaunted. 

She continued to start feminist organizations. In 1977, Diana co-founded Women Against Violence in Pornography and Media (WAVPM), the first feminist anti-pornography organization in the United States and internationally. She also founded FANG (Feminists’ Anti-Nuclear Group) in response to the failure of the peace movement to recognize the role of patriarchy in the development of nuclear arms. This culminated in the publication of Exposing Nuclear Phallacies (1989), designated an Outstanding Book on human rights in the United States by the Gustavus Myers Center in 1990. In 1993, Russell initiated an organization called Women United Against Incest, which supports incest survivors with legal assistance against their perpetrators. Similarly, she created the first TV program in South Africa where incest survivors talk in person about their experiences. 

After spending a half century conducting research, writing and publishing books and articles, public speaking, and political activism to combat male sexual violence against females, Diana shifted her attention to her memoirs. She died before she could complete them. For a more complete summary of Diana’s life and accomplishments, please visit her website: dianarussell.com. 

Consonant with her egalitarian values, Diana lived in a collective household with several other women and a succession of cherished rescue dogs. On the occasions when she allowed herself time-outs from her work, she shared a meal with one of her friends. Those of us fortunate enough to be included in her circle were awed by her single-minded dedication and her remarkable achievements. In addition to our reverence for her, we loved her. 

She is survived by her sister Jill Russell, scores of friends and co-activists, and the thousands of women who owe their survival to her work. 

In her honor, donations can be made to any feminist organization or to your local ASPCA. 

 

Diana E. H. Russell, world-renowned feminist activist, scholar, and author died July 28th in Oakland, California. She was 81 years old. The cause of her death was cardiac arrest. 

Diana Russell devoted her life to the remediation of crimes against women. She authored numerous books and articles on marital rape, femicide, incest, misogynist murders of women, and pornography. In addition to her scholarship, Diana was a grass roots organizer. In the mid-1970s, she started lobbying feminists around the world. Her organizing efforts resulted in the first International Tribunal on Crimes against Women in Brussels, Belgium. Two thousand women from 40 countries heard first-hand accounts of the gender-related violence and oppression tribunal speakers had experienced. Simone de Beauvoir in her introductory speech to the Tribunal said: "I salute the International Tribunal as the beginning of the radical decolonization of women." Later, Belgian feminist Nicole Van de Ven documented the event in a book, Crimes Against Women: The Proceedings of the International Tribunal

Diana Russell was born and raised in Cape Town, South Africa, the fourth of the six children of a South African father and a British mother. After completing her Bachelor's degree from the University of Cape Town, at the age of 19, Russell left for the United Kingdom. 

In Britain, she enrolled in the London School of Economics in Political Science. In 1961, she completed a Master’s degree and received the prize for the best student in the program. In 1963 she was accepted into an interdisciplinary PhD program at Harvard University and she moved to Boston. Her research focused on sociology and the study of revolution. 

Diana’s research focus stemmed from her own involvement in the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. In 1963, Russell had joined the Liberal Party of South Africa that had been founded by Alan Paton, the author of Cry the Beloved Country. While participating in a peaceful protest in Cape Town, Russell was arrested with other party members. She came to the conclusion that non-violent strategies were futile against the brutal violence and repression of the white Afrikaner police state. Thereafter, she joined the African Resistance Movement (ARM), an underground revolutionary movement fighting apartheid in South Africa. The principal strategy of the ARM was to bomb and sabotage government property, and though Russell was only a peripheral member of the ARM, she still risked a 10-year incarceration if caught. During this period, Diana’s father was a member of the emphatically apartheid parliament of South Africa. 

After completing her doctorate, Diana was hired as a sociology professor at Mills College in Oakland, California. During her first year, she co-taught the first course on women ever offered at Mills. Eventually this course led to the development of the Women’s Studies curriculum at Mills –one of the first in the U.S. 

In 1977, Diana conducted an extensive series of in-depth interviews with women. Data she gathered from these nine hundred interviews appeared in a series of books: Rape in Marriage (1982), Sexual Exploitation: Rape, Child Sexual Abuse, Workplace Harassment (1984), and The Secret Trauma: Incest in the Lives of Girls and Women (1986). The Secret Trauma, the first scientific study of incestuous abuse ever conducted, was the co-recipient of the prestigious C. Wright Mills Award in 1986. 

In 1987, Diana traveled to South Africa to conduct interviews with revolutionary women activists in the anti-apartheid liberation struggle. Upon her return, she published Lives of Courage: Women for a New South Africa (1989). In 1993, Diana edited an anthology on pornography, Making Violence Sexy: Feminist Views on Pornography. Her 1994 book, Against Pornography: The Evidence of Harm, which included 100 pornographic photos, made the connection between pornography and increased incidents of rape. 

Perhaps Diana’s most significant theoretical contribution to the field of women’s studies was a single word. In 1976 Russell redefined ‘femicide’ as "the killing of females by males because they are female." Russell's intention was to politicize the term. She wanted to bring attention to the misogyny driving lethal crimes against women, which she said gender-neutral terms like murder failed to do. In order to deal with these extreme crimes against women, Diana insisted, it was necessary to recognize that, like race-based hate crimes, "Femicides are [also] lethal hate crimes." 

Feminist movements in many countries in Latin America, as in Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Chile, and El Salvador among others, have adopted the use of Russell's politicized 'femicide' and have successfully used it socially, politically and legally to address lethal violence against women in their respective countries. In 1992, she co-edited an anthology, Femicide: The Politics of Woman Killing. 

In addition to her publications, Diana always found time for boots-on-the ground activism. She was often on the front lines of feminist protests in the USA, South Africa, Europe, and the U.K. In concert with other feminists, she demonstrated outside courthouses and theaters; she staged sit-ins in various government offices; she spray-painted feminist slogans on misogynist businesses; and destroyed magazines in porn stores. For many months, she was the solo picketer outside a Berkeley restaurant owned by a trafficker in underage girls. Her acts of civil disobedience often satirized her targets. In 1991, for example, a waitress refused to serve a male customer because he was reading Playboy. She was fired for her act of rebellion. Hefner responded by flying in a large quantity of issues of his magazine that were distributed free to all the diner customers to read. Diana and six friends dressed as waitresses and served ketchup-covered penises and testicles (adroitly sculpted hotdogs) on plates to the crowd that had gathered outside. 

For her various acts of civil disobedience, Diana paid a price. She was sued, arrested a half dozen times, and, on occasion, physically attacked. She remained undaunted. 

She continued to start feminist organizations. In 1977, Diana co-founded Women Against Violence in Pornography and Media (WAVPM), the first feminist anti-pornography organization in the United States and internationally. She also founded FANG (Feminists’ Anti-Nuclear Group) in response to the failure of the peace movement to recognize the role of patriarchy in the development of nuclear arms. This culminated in the publication of Exposing Nuclear Phallacies (1989), designated an Outstanding Book on human rights in the United States by the Gustavus Myers Center in 1990. In 1993, Russell initiated an organization called Women United Against Incest, which supports incest survivors with legal assistance against their perpetrators. Similarly, she created the first TV program in South Africa where incest survivors talk in person about their experiences. 

After spending a half century conducting research, writing and publishing books and articles, public speaking, and political activism to combat male sexual violence against females, Diana shifted her attention to her memoirs. She died before she could complete them. For a more complete summary of Diana’s life and accomplishments, please visit her website: dianarussell.com. 

Consonant with her egalitarian values, Diana lived in a collective household with several other women and a succession of cherished rescue dogs. On the occasions when she allowed herself time-outs from her work, she shared a meal with one of her friends. Those of us fortunate enough to be included in her circle were awed by her single-minded dedication and her remarkable achievements. In addition to our reverence for her, we loved her. 

She is survived by her sister Jill Russell, scores of friends and co-activists, and the thousands of women who owe their survival to her work. 

In her honor, donations can be made to any feminist organization or to Berkeley Humane or Berkeley Animal Care Service. 

 

vv 

 


Opinion

Public Comment

On Councilor Droste’s Proposal on Re-Districting

Phil Allen, District One resident
Saturday August 01, 2020 - 01:09:00 PM

During a discussion over a November ballot measure about promoting our elected deciders to full-time status conducted at the 4pm meeting of the City Council of Tuesday July 21, D-8 councilmember Lori Droste mused about reducing the number of city commissions, then went further by suggesting fewer council districts as well. (These moves would cut costs, the savings then presumably applied to the councilors’ ‘raises’.) While both notions are bound to generate loud opinions, the second struck me as both timely and prescient. Whether or not she was expecting a constructive reaction from her out-of-the-whirlwind inspiration, she has one. My idea may put Berkeley on the map—a new map. 

Our eight districts’ boundaries are about to be adjusted, as happens decennially upon the taking of the census, to assure equal populations. The City Clerk will open the process by September 1, with nominations to the 13-member Citizens Redistricting Commission commencing by February 1. Their findings will be placed before the voters in November 2022. 

District-based representation took hold in 1986 to redress what was seen as inequitable at-large councilships. Given the town’s particular geography, the familiar block-like shapes that characterize so much of America’s political land division are taken by some of the eight districts. The others, sitting on rising land and the hills, are more organically outlined. As such, each has acquired characteristics particular to its social and economic characteristics, from wealthy to as poor as one can be and still live here, from essentially residential to mixed uses and zonings. 

As long as numbers are equalized, why not consider a conceptual redesign? I propose the creation of new districts—of whatever even number—in sympathy with our unique geography, by which I mean our creekbeds. Six creeks run to the Bay by meandering routes, fed by numerous springs. By standing on several north/south streets in west Berkeley, one can see the undulations they created before being culverted and paved or built over. How many cities can claim to lay upon such natural a wonder, beyond the Bay Area that is? They provide the re-design basis, and are not necessarily meant to be taken as strict boundaries.  

Creekbeds and their flanks—riparian environments—are about the smallest fry of watersheds, those grand unique domains of biota and climate formed by mountainous heights and the river systems descending from them. While some speculative geographers and the bioregional movement fancy them as primary subdivisions (which New Zealand did some 30 years ago), the native waviness of our flatlands is too slight to generate such noticeable differences. However, many municipalities—particularly in waterlogged areas like the Pacific Northwest or the floating sponge that is upper Minnesota—sit amidst and manage watershed ‘districts’ which are often protected natural reservations. 

As I see it, parts of the entire city would be contained in each of these new ribbon districts, running from our eastern esplanade to the bay shore, and would include the range of incomes, elevations, biota, land-use zones and types, businesses and recreation. 

What are some disadvantages? A return to an at-large council run by well-funded individuals or factions. (I know, where’s the difference?) There might not be focused areas of representation, such as the campus area or the historically beset southwest. The waterfront might be Balkanized. 

And then there is the problem our Founders should have taken care of but didn’t: Landlocked Districts Five and Six issues well north of the rest of town. The City of Albany stands in its way to the sea. Should Albany be conquered, its land annexed to a greater Berkeley, and perhaps more districts? After all, it too has creekbeds. 

Remember, that Commission has about eight months to be picked and seated. Let’s help make their tenure memorable! 


BLM Offers Lessons to Indian Police

Jagjit Singh
Saturday August 01, 2020 - 03:30:00 PM

The Black Live Matter movement is gaining resonance in many of the minority communities around the world.

In Israel BLM has reenergized Palestinians, “Palestinian Lives Matter” are ubiquitous banners seen in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The horrific murder of George Floyd has renewed demands for ISRAEL GET YOUR LEG OFF PALESTINIAN NECKS!

In India police violence against Muslim minorities following the highly unpopular “Citzenship Law” created deep hostiles and mistrust. Disturbing accounts had emerged of gross mistreatment by police and state officials in the town of Nagina. Police chased young teenagers ranging in age from 13 to 17 and brutally tortured them. According to two of the boys, the officers laughed during beatings, saying, “You will die in this prison.” Witnesses said that police officers opened fire on demonstrators with live ammunition, broke into houses, stole money, and threatened to rape women. 

The BBC aired footage showing police officers knocking down security cameras in a Muslim neighborhood and shattering the windows of parked cars. Although these incidents occurred a year ago the situation has become worse with the pandemic as hundreds of poor low caste Hindus and Muslims flee to their villages often beaten mercilessly by police. 

Harsh Mander, a human rights activist visited homes resembling “wastelands,” where the police have become a lunch mob. Much like the US, none of the police officers were charged and continue to act with complete immunity buffeted by the right wing Modi government which seems to be in lockstep with President Trump.  

The overt discrimination towards Muslims threatens the very foundation of India as a secular and tolerant nation. This is extremely distressing for a nation which often boasts of its spiritual heritage. Donning religious garbs and chanting from scriptures is a waste of time if we do not imbibe the spiritual jewels into our everyday behavior to make as us kinder, gentler, honest and more compassionate people. Sadly, I have never come across an Indian family which has been not been fractured by financial entanglements rooted in dishonesty. 

Lashing out against minorities and committing egregious acts of violence only demeans us. 

The police have emphasized the need to preserve order and protect innocent people against “radical groups” with “deep-rooted conspiracies” to commit violent acts. Sounds familiar? President Trump would be so proud! 

If we really wish to bring honor and respect to Hinduism we should dismantle the unjust and cruel caste system. God did not give life to his most vulnerable people to be reviled and abused. Finally, let us remember the incredible life of African-American Rep. John Lewis who demonstrated enormous courage in advancing the cause of justice. 

For more go to, http://callforsocialjustice.blogspot.com/ Jagjit Singh


Major League Baseball Opened Too Soon

Ralph E. Stone
Saturday August 01, 2020 - 03:00:00 PM

It is time to pull the plug on Major League Baseball. From the beginning, I suspected from the beginning that the reopening of the pandemic-shortened Major League Baseball season would be short-lived. Given the raging pandemic, MLB was unwise to reopen in the first place.  

I cannot think of anything more non-essential and out-of-place as professional sports. Its become an article of faith that having baseball back would be a morale booster to society suffering from the virus. This assertion is self-serving and overstated. MLB just didnt want to miss its $10+ billion in annual revenue. 

Although, players are in sort of a bubble, a bubble that disappears once the players leave the stadium. It is clear that the MLB cannot keep its players safe. Fifty-eight Major League Baseball players tested positive for the coronavirus upon reporting to their team, while an additional 13 tested positive after workouts began, according to data released by MLB on July 24. And at least 14 members of the Miami Marlins and their staff have tested positive for the virus in recent days. And each passing day, we learn about new players testing positive. 

Now the National Football League is planning games as does the Pacific-12 Conference. The PAC-12 plans September 26 openers with a 10-game, conference-only football schedule even though four conference schools are in California and two in Arizona, states with raging infections. Are the players going to wear masks when they face each other across the line of scrimmage? And forget about social distancing. 

Lets get the pandemic under control before reopening sports.


August Pepper Spray Times

By Grace Underpressure
Monday August 03, 2020 - 03:02:00 PM

Editor's Note: The latest issue of the Pepper Spray Times is now available.

You can view it absolutely free of charge by clicking here . You can print it out to give to your friends.

Grace Underpressure has been producing it for many years now, even before the Berkeley Daily Planet started distributing it, most of the time without being paid, and now we'd like you to show your appreciation by using the button below to send her money.

This is a Very Good Deal. Go for it! 


Columns

ON MENTAL ILLNESS: Most People With Mental Illness Struggle With Self-Esteem

Jack Bragen
Saturday August 01, 2020 - 03:17:00 PM

Most adults who live in the U.S. seem to link their self-worth with their careers. Many also identify with their body image, irrespective of gender. Some pin their self-esteem on high intelligence. People seek advanced college degrees in the expectation that it will allow them to earn more money, and for the purpose of self-worth. Thus, we have Americans who exercise and watch their diet, and who educate themselves and increase their earnings. Many Americans value the accomplishments of their offspring, as extensions of themselves.

Mentally ill people, if we went into a bar and someone approached us to ask, "What do you do?" We might not have a good answer. It would be an awkward moment. And, because psych medications adversely affect metabolism and make it a lot harder to exercise, we may not have a fit physique. Regarding the accomplishments of family, we may have parents or siblings who've done well for themselves, but very few mentally ill people are raising their kids, if they have produced them. Thus, again, when we are approached in a bar or at almost any gathering, when asked about ourselves, we might not have much to say, and this is awkward.

Under these circumstances, it is difficult to have much self-esteem. If we are subject to outpatient institutionalization, and if we don't have a professional job, we may be subject to implied messages telling us that we're subnormal. 

A diagnosis that effectively says there is a major defect in one's brain, by itself, constitutes a substantial blow to self-esteem. The cause of this is cultural. We've learned via osmosis that if we have a supposed defect, we do not deserve to like ourselves. This is why so many Americans are trying so hard to have the perfect bodies, the perfect careers, the finest cars, and so on. In modern times, everyone is measured by material possessions, by wealth, and by tangible achievements. People are in fierce competition with each other on who is the biggest, and the best, in the aforesaid realm. 

People should realize that if they could get to know themselves better on the inside, they could create limitless self-esteem by means of a few simple mental exercises. And this doesn't necessitate being insane; actually, learning about one's insides will make a person saner than they were. 

People with mental illness can value ourselves. It requires that we wholly reject society's shallow material standards of a person's worth. We can replace this with self-talk and self-coaching that builds up our self-acceptance, so that when people try to put us down, the detracting messages don't make it through the invisible shield we've created that protects our self-approval. This is an advantage that we can give to ourselves, and a thing that supposedly successful people do not know how to achieve. 

I'll offer a few examples: "I did not create my brain, so if it has a defect, it is not my fault." "It is not how perfect or powerful my brain is that counts, but what I do with it and how well I use it." "I do not have the perfect six pack of abdominal muscles or the biggest biceps, but I can accept myself as I am." 

The above are positive self-building statements that we can feed ourselves. And, I have news for you, mentally ill people aren't the only ones with self-esteem problems. 


Jack Bragen is author of "Instructions for Dealing with Schizophrenia: A Self-Help Manual," and lives in Martinez.


Smithereens: Reflections on Bits & Pieces

Gar Smith
Saturday August 01, 2020 - 03:03:00 PM

We're living in a revolutionary era (with Donald Trump standing in for King George). Racist statues are being toppled from DC to SF. Even Abe Lincoln and FDR are being called out for their racist failings (Abe ordered the 1862 mass execution of 39 Dakota men while FDR ignored Eleanor's pleas to sign a federal anti-lynching law). But if we're going to topple statues and call for renaming US military bases and high schools, we might also want to consider renaming our weapons of war.

Take tanks, for starters. The Sherman Tank, one of our best-known combat vehicles, honors the memory of Union Army General William Tecumseh Sherman. But, as the History Engine notes, Sherman "forbade the entry of African- Americans into the army. Sherman did not hide the fact that he was a white supremacist." (Sherman's legacy is probably safe for the moment. It's too much trouble to topple a tank.) 

And I'm not suggesting we rename our aircraft carriers (named after American presidents and including the USS Abe Lincoln, the USS Theodore Roosevelt and the over-budget/under-performing USS Gerald Ford). These massive naval vessels mainly exist to enforce compliance with Washington's program of Global Empire so it wouldn't make sense to rename them after anyone who wasn't a warmonger. Perhaps our aircraft carriers and battleships could be put to better use if they were simply decommissioned and home-ported to provide onboard shelters for America's 40,000 homeless veterans

But here's something we can do: Isn't it past time the Pentagon reconsidered Army Regulation 70-28 and stopped naming its helicopters after native nations vanquished by the Army and the US Calvary? Apache. Black Hawk. Chinook. Comanche. Kiowa. Lakota. Sioux. This is probably not the best way to commemorate America's "Indian Wars"—which raged for 148 years. 

John Lewis and the Free Speech Movement 

For decades, in and out of politics, John Lewis was an advocate for "Good Trouble." So it's no surprise that he reached out to the students who were arrested and beaten for occupying Sproul Hall during what became known as Berkeley's Free Speech Movement. 

Earlier today, while thumbing through a thumbdrive filled with copies of old documents, I came across a letter of solidarity that Carl Lewis, then chair of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), had written to the young protesters in Berkeley. The letter, written from SNCC's New York office on December 3, 1964, reads: 

"We wish to express our support for our brothers and sisters at the University of California in their fight for full free speech on the university campus. 

"University administration attempts to curtail the activity of the Friends of SNCC are an attack on the civil rights movement in the deep South. 

"We are shocked at the brutality used by police against the students who sat in at the University's administration building. Police brutality in the South is nothing new to us—but what is happening in the so-called liberal community of Berkeley? 

"Students have the right to participate in political activity on and off the campus. We know well the attempts by administrators on the campuses of Southern Negro colleges to break the civil rights movement by not allowing students to meet and advocate ideas on the campus. Now university administrators in the North are borrowing these same tactics. Such denial of students' rights—North or South—is an affront to the ideals of American democracy." 

A Surprising Legacy of Slavery 

During the Alabama celebrations of the life of Congressmember John Lewis ("The Conscience of the Congress," "The Boy from Troy") one of pastors presiding over the funeral service offered an appeal to the Almighty that began: "Dear Merciful Master…." 

Given that one of the underlying power chords of Lewis' anthemic life was the righteous rebellion against White Masters who imposed enslavement on generations of kidnapped Africans, a plea directed to a "Merciful Master" struck me as a bit discordant. 

Speaking as a former Boy Scout Troop Chaplain, this served to remind me that there are uncomfortable similarities between many religions and the slave-master relationship. In the case of Christianity, suffering believers pray for relief from an "Almighty lord" while remaining as docile as "flocks of sheep" in hopes that a "jealous god" (Exodus 34:14) will someday admit them to the "Kingdom" of Heaven. 

The Mendacity of Mitch McConnell 

And then there was Mitch McConnell's performance at the Capital Hill ceremony held to honor John Lewis' life. Mimicking a display of mourning, McConnell praised John Lewis' life while standing in the way of Lewis realizing his dream—a bill to restore a voting rights act that Trump has ridiculed and McConnell has vowed to block. 

In honor of Lewis' long struggle for equality, Democrats have renamed the bill the "John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act." In Lewis' last month on Earth, Mitch McConnell told John Lewis what he thought of the bill. He disparaged concerns over the GOP's long record of placing roadblocks between voters-of-color and the ballot box as nothing but "voter-suppression nonsense." 

The reality is, voter suppression has exploded across Republican-controlled "red states" since the fateful day in 2013 when Supreme Court conservatives stripped protections from the 1968 Voting Rights Act. 

Following the Capital Hill ceremony Democratic Congressman James Clyburn told CNN: "Trump and the Senate leadership, Mitch McConnell...if they so celebrate the heroism of this man, then let's go to work and pass that bill. Words may be powerful, but deeds are lasting." 

 

US Veterans Place Ad Calling Trump a Traitor 

The American people need relief, support, and protection. Instead, the Trump Administration is failing to lead. It appears that the only thing that Trump has succeeded in achieving is … failure. 

 

CREDO Exposes AT&T's Upgrade Charade 

Last week, AT&T customers received an alarming email headlined: "UPDATE NEEDED." The note warned customers that their phones were no longer "compatible with the new network and you need to replace it to continue receiving service." But, as CREDO (the phone company with a conscience) recently revealed, it was all a scam. 

The truth is, AT&T's planned network update won't happen until February 2022. 

"As a mobile provider that was founded on doing good," CREDO stated, "we pride ourselves on treating our customers with respect." 

AT&T, on the other hand, is known for its "long history of corporate greed and supporting Republican politicians and right-wing interests. They've donated millions to Donald Trump and anti-LGBTQ candidates and have worked hand-in-hand to help the NSA spy on Americans’ Internet traffic." 

CREDO, however, invests its profits to fill social needs, not private pockets. In any given year, CREDO pumps nearly $2 million into progressive campaigns that promote civil rights, reproductive freedom, climate justice, and more. And CREDO lets its customers vote to decide which do-good groups reap the monthly benefits. AT&T would prefer that you ignore CREDO's informative link: Here Are 8 Reasons to Drop AT&T. 

Fund the Post Office; Defend Democracy 

Remember the HEROES Act? This emergency bill was passed more than two months ago by the Democrat=controlled House. The legislation would direct billions of dollars to address the country's mounting health, economic, and education troubles. And the act also includes $25 billion for America's most beloved institution—the US Postal Service.  

The USPS is an indispensible service that may prove essential to assuring the survival of another cherished American institution—the right to vote. With many Americans loath to risk their lives standing in long lines waiting to vote during a deadly pandemic, the Senate needs to follow Congress' lead and fully fund the USPS in the next COVID-19 stimulus package. Sign the Petition: Demand the Senate fund the USPS

 

How the GOP's Covid-19 Bill Would Enrich the Pentagon 

Trump's inaction on health, homes, and harmony has brought the nation to a precipice where millions of Americans risk losing federal unemployment assistance and eviction protections, where more than five million people have lost health coverage in the middle of a rampaging pandemic, where armed US Militias have been ordered to invade US cities and attack US citizens (but only in "liberal, Democratic states"). States ravaged by rising Covid-19 infections and deaths need federal funding for testing but the aid isn't coming because the White House values the sales of heat-seeking missiles over the needs of relief-seeking Americans. 

Thirty-two Senators and 93 members of the Congress voted to cut Pentagon funding by 10 percent—a level of Pentagon disaffection that, until recently, would have been unthinkable. 

So what do we find when we dig into the GOP's 177-page "pandemic relief" document? How about a corporate wish-list soliciting $30 billion dollars for more spending on costly and needless Pentagon playthings—fighter jets, helicopters, and missile defense systems. (All this for a Pentagon that has already been granted $740 billion FY 2021.) At the same time, Win Without War notes, the Reap-publicans are "nickel and diming families who desperately need protections and benefits to put food on their tables and keep roofs over their heads." 

And why are Senate Republicans willing to give the Pentagon another $30 billion? Here's one rationale: to repay the military for the funds Donald Trump siphoned from the Pentagon's fiscal swamp to finance construction of his anarchistic/narcissistic border wall. 

Also included in the GOP's $30 billion menu: a $11 billion gift to repay contractors for money lost because of the Covid-19 virus (no auditable proof of losses required) and a $686 million add-on for the endless costs of the disastrous F-35 fighter jet (aka "the fighter jet that ate the Pentagon"). One of the projects would finance construction of a military vessel at a shipyard in Alabama, home state of Sen. Richard Shelby, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee. (Dare one whisper "corruption"?) 

Consider what that $30 billion could buy if it were spent on PPE and ventilators or shared to keep families protected from eviction and fed during a prolonged economic collapse. 

As Win Without War puts in: "Pandemic relief dollars should NOT go to the Pentagon FULL STOP." 

Speaker Pelosi has the power to block the GOP's corp-friendly bailout. In April, opposition to the "pandemic profiteering" embedded in the GOP's Covid relief bill lead to its defeat. We can do it again. We need to Defund the Pentagon and Defend the People. Tell Speaker Pelosi: Reject the GOP’s Giveaway to the Pentagon in COVID-19 Relief! 

The GOP's Covid-19 Plan: Billions for Weapons; Zilch for Workers 

Public Citizen president Robert Weissman also sat down for a close reading of the GOP's Covid-19 relief bill and reached this conclusion: "My reaction in a phrase: Are you kidding me?"  

Here's Public Citizen's list of some of the targeted provisions you could expect to find in the GOP's America: 

  • Presumptive immunity from lawsuits for corporations that adopt a written policy saying they aim to comply with governmental coronavirus standards. Just a written policy!
  • $1.75 billion for a new FBI building at the site of its current headquarters in Washington, D.C.—demanded by the Trump administration to prevent the site from being used for a hotel that would compete with the Trump International Hotel, which just happens to be right across the street.
  • A scheme to create a commission that would lead to severe cuts in Social Security benefits.
Weissman sums it up perfectly: "The half-baked, watered-down, corporate-handout proposal kludged together by Mitch McConnell and the Trump Gang is a travesty. Get serious and get to work on the bold, comprehensive coronavirus relief legislation the American people and our economy need." 

Here's a Capitol Idea 

The suit-and-tie denizens of Capitol Hill seem to have all the capital while the half-million-plus flatland residents of Washington, DC are living lower-case lives. It's just not fair. With 705,749 residents, the District of Columbia boasts a population larger than Wyoming (578,759) or Vermont (623,980) but, unlike these two privileged states, the District has no representation in Congress. While they pay taxes, the people who live in the Capitol of Democracy have no right to vote. In the heart of Democracy—no ballot boxes! Taxation without representation! But that could change. As Sen. Kamala Harris recently declared: “It’s time to grant DC Statehood.” 

"This broken, undemocratic system unfairly favors Republicans," the Daily Kos notes, "but if DC gets statehood, we would get TWO more Democratic Senators. That’s why Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump have vowed to sabotage DC Statehood." 

The solution? "An army of 10,000 supporters to sign our petition and force the Senate to PASS statehood." The Collective PAC's petition calls for extending the rights of citizenship to the disenfranchised people in our capitol city. 

A Closer Look at Trump's Threat to Void the November Election 

 


Arts & Events

Protest To Stop UC Berkeley Evictions at 1921 Walnut St.

1921 Walnut St. Association
Saturday August 01, 2020 - 03:09:00 PM

From: 1921 Walnut St. Association in Downtown Berkeley, and ally organizations 

When: 4:00 pm Monday, August 3, 2020 

Where: 1111 Franklin Street Oakland, CA: OUTSIDE in front of the building 

What: – Second Protest 

On July 15, 2020, The University of California officially became the new landlord of the long-term/rent-controlled tenants at 1921 Walnut St., despite objections from Berkeley Mayor Arreguin, Berkeley City Council, Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board, the elected representatives of the UCB student body (ASUC), tenants’ rights organizations and the tenants themselves. In response, the tenants of 1921 Walnut St. and allies will be protesting at the UC Regents’ office in Oakland, demanding that UC stop all plans to evict these tenants and demolish these affordable housing units. 

This purchase of 1921 Walnut St. was UC’s “crossing the Rubicon” moment; signaling UC’s refusal to engage with the local community, be held to public scrutiny or adhere to the ethical values required of any publicly funded university. Now that UC owns the property, the tenants are no longer protected by Berkeley rent laws because of UC’s special privilege as a public university. As part of their special status, UC receives public funding and has a commitment to the public good and thus, UC has a responsibility to the local communities in which it operates. 

Despite those obligations, UC is violating the trust and good faith of the people of California by not working with the tenants of 1921 Walnut St., refusing to compromise with Berkeley elected officials, and ignoring all objections of the student body (ASUC) and other community members. Although UC is subject to state laws, UC even refuses to comply with SB-330 Housing Crisis Act of 2019 and are essentially “picking and choosing” the state laws they want to follow. In light of the recent California Public Records Act (CPRA) document release, it is now evident that UC has enlisted wealthy landlord and heiress Jackie Safier to assist in the redevelopment of 1921 Walnut St. Until this public records request, Safier’s involvement has been kept secret in yet another attempt by UC to hide from public scrutiny. Impunity, unaccountability, anti-affordable housing, disrespect of local communities – are these the values Californians want associated with their public university? Or will Californians hold UC to the standards of public service, ethical behavior and respect for local communities? 

While it is evident that many Californians prefer UC to be ethical and transparent, it is also evident that UC will continue to act with impunity until they are held accountable. Despite the devastating news that UC is now their landlord, the tenants of 1921 Walnut St. continue their “David vs Goliath” struggle to save their homes and to hold UC accountable. 

Event Info: There will be a small, physically distanced action OUTSIDE in front of 1111 Franklin Street in Oakland with the tenants and allies. We welcome media attention and coverage, and will be available before, during, and after the event for media to contact. Prior to the event, questions can be sent to 1921WalnutStAssociation@gmail.com with a copy to John Selawsky of the Berkeley Tenants Union, who can be reached via e-mail at: websky66@gmail.com or phone 510.590.6227 

Background and Contacts: 

To learn more about 1921 Walnut St. and to access the California Public Records Act (CPRA) documents, visit https://www.save1921walnut.org 

or go directly to: 

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/t3pv7cnbtrkcg7h/AACRngXl_bM4Z1qexcoWvYyXa?dl=0 

To see the letter the Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board sent UC on June 8, 2020, visit: 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/uploadedFiles/Rent_Stabilization_Board/Level_3_-_General/INFO_Ltr%20to%20UC%20Regents%20re%201921%20Walnut%20St.pdf 

To see the Berkeley City Council approved “Resolution in Support of 1921 Walnut Street”:  

https://www.dropbox.com/s/877d6gku0lgk5j4/2020-07-28%20Revised%20Agenda%20Packet%20-%20Council%20-%20WEB.pdf?dl=0 

and contact author Councilmember Kate Harrison KHarrison@cityofberkeley.info 

To see the Berkeley Architectural Heritage Association statement of support, visit: 

https://www.save1921walnut.org/about 

To contact the Associated Students of the University of California (ASUC) for comment, contact
Derek Imai eavp@asuc.org 

To learn more about UC’s planned eviction of tenants, demolition of 1921 Walnut St., redevelopment plan and citations, visit https://www.save1921walnut.org/ 

To see UC Regents ethical commitments and Policy 1111: Policy on Statement of Ethical Values and Standards of Ethical Conduct, visit: 

https://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/governance/policies/1111.html 

 


The Berkeley Activist's Calendar, August 2-9

Kelly Hammargren, Sustainable Berkeley Coalition
Saturday August 01, 2020 - 01:22:00 PM

Worth Noting:

July 31, The total number of COVID-19 cases in California is now more than 500,000. California now has more cases of COVID-19 than 191 countries. Only the total US, Brazil, India and Russia have reported more cases of COVID-19 than the State of California.



City Council is on Summer Recess through September 14, 2020. Most of the Boards and Commissions recess during August and the majority have been held from meeting even via zoom since the shelter in place order March 16th.



There are four City meetings in the coming week.

Monday – Ashby and North Berkeley BART Community Advisory Group, 6 pm. The number of decisions that have already been made regarding the BART Projects can be reviewed through the website link below with the meeting agenda. The BART Projects will be a minimum of 7 stories. 

Wednesday - Planning Commission, 7 pm 

Thursday – Rent Stabilization Board Habitable and Sustainable Housing Committee, 5:30 pm and Landmarks Preservation Commission, 7 pm. 

 

Sunday, August 2, 2020  

No City meetings or events found 

 

Monday, August 3, 2020 

Ashby and North Berkeley BART Community Advisory Group, 6 – 9 pm https://www.cityofberkeley.info/bartplanning/ 

Videoconference: https://zoom.us/j/92611093233 

Teleconference: 669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 926 1109 3233 

Agenda: 2. CAG Roles and Process, 3. Planning Process, 4. Zoning AB2923, Development Parameters and Community Goals, 5. Preliminary Site Concepts, 6. Next Steps, 7. Public Comment 

 

Tuesday, August 4, 2020 

No City meetings or events found 

 

Wednesday, August 5, 2020 

Planning Commission, 7 – 10 pm 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Clerk/Commissions/Commissions__Planning_Commission_Homepage.aspx 

Videoconference: https://zoom.us/j/92939134810 

Teleconference: 669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 929 3913 4810 

Agenda: 9. Public Hearing: Southside Zoning Ordinance Amendments Project Update and Draft EIR scoping session, 10. ZORP Phase 1 – Baseline Zoning Ordinance 

 

Thursday, August 6, 2020 

Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board Habitable and Sustainable Housing Committee, 5:30 pm 

http://www.cityofberkeley.info/rent/ 

Videoconference: https://zoom.us/j/94831963731?pwd=UGJ0Ny9FdkNyVVdDQnhlS2dzT1VxUT09#success 

Passcode: 732485  

Teleconference: 669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 732584 

Agenda: Discussion and possible action 6. Solar cost sharing, 7. Car chargers, 8. dishwashers 

 

Landmarks Preservation Commission, 7 – 11:30 pm 

http://www.cityofberkeley.info/landmarkspreservationcommission/ 

Videoconference: https://zoom.us/j/92990053892 

Teleconference: 669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 929 9005 3892 

1740 San Pablo – Section 106 Referral 

1915 Berryman – Landmark or Structure of Merit designation for Payson House 

2015 Blake – Demolition referral 

2019 Blake – Demolition referral 

1207 Tenth – Demolition referral 

1 Orchard Lane – Landmark Initiation 

2939 Dwight Way - Landmark of Structure of Merit Initiation 

Notice of Preparation of Draft EIR for Southside Ordinance Amendments 

Staff Announcements Impact of SB 300 on Landmarks, 

 

Friday, August 7, 2020, Saturday, August 8, 2020, Sunday, August 9, 2020 

No City meetings or events found 

_____________________ 

 

Public Hearings Scheduled – Land Use Appeals 

1346 Ordway, TBD 

Notice of Decision (NOD) and Use Permits With End of Appeal Period 

2319 California 8/4/2020 

545 Colusa 7/30/2020 

800 Dwight 8/20/2020 

118 El Camino 8/13/2020 

979 Regal 8/4/2020 

3015 San Pablo 8/12/2020 

1120 Second (LPC) 

41 San Diego Rd (LPC) 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Planning_and_Development/Land_Use_Division/Current_Zoning_Applications_in_Appeal_Period.aspx 

 

LINK to Current Zoning Applications https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Planning_and_Development/Land_Use_Division/Current_Zoning_Applications.aspx 

 

___________________ 

 

WORKSHOPS 

Sept 29 – Digital Strategic Plan/FUND$ Replacement Website Update, Zero Waste Priorities, Vision 2050 

Oct 20 – Update Berkeley’s 2020 Vision, BMASP/Berkeley Pier-WETA Ferry 

 

Unscheduled Workshops/Presentations 

Cannabis Health Considerations 

Presentation from StopWaste on SB 1383 

Systems Realignment 

 

Previously Schedules and Unscheduled Items Removed From Lists 

Sept 22 – Navigable Cities, Crime Report (per Mayor Arreguin the Crime Report will be rescheduled to a regular City Council meeting, the date is not available. The last crime report was in March 2019) 

Ohlone Territory 

 

_____________________ 

To Check For Regional Meetings with Berkeley Council Appointees go to 

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Clerk/City_Council/City_Council__Committee_and_Regional_Body_Appointees.aspx 

 

To check for Berkeley Unified School District Board Meetings go to 

https://www.berkeleyschools.net/schoolboard/board-meeting-information/ 

 

_____________________ 

 

This meeting list is also posted on the Sustainable Berkeley Coalition website. 

http://www.sustainableberkeleycoalition.com/whats-ahead.html and in the Berkeley Daily Planet under activist’s calendar http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com 

 

When notices of meetings are found that are posted after Friday 5:00 pm they are added to the website schedule https://www.sustainableberkeleycoalition.com/whats-ahead.html and preceded by LATE ENTRY 

 

If you wish to stop receiving the Weekly Summary of City Meetings please forward the weekly summary you received to kellyhammargren@gmail.com